Figure 1: Procedure, data, and calculations
Data
Data table 1: calculated wavelength and
frequency
Spinning Speed
|
ω(rad/s)
|
ƒ(Hz)
|
λ(m)
|
slow
|
3859 ±
0.4736
|
614.18 ±
0.07538
|
0.558 ±
0.0000002
|
Fast
|
5068 ±
1.016
|
806.60 ±
0.1617
|
0.425 ±
0.000000249
|
V= ƒ*λ
(V=343m/s)
Data Table 2: length of the pipe
Spinning Speed
|
Value of n
|
Exp. length(m)
|
Actual length(m)
|
% Error(%)
|
slow
|
3
|
0.837 ±
0.000102
|
0.80 ±
0.05
|
4.6
|
Fast
|
4
|
0.850 ±
0.000169
|
6.3
|
% Error= (experimental length-actual length)/actual
length*100%
Conclusion:
The purpose of this experiment was to find out the length
of an opened hollow pipe using sound waves. The pipe was first spinned in a
slower speed, and then in a faster speed. If the harmonics of the slower speed was
n, that of the faster speed should be n+1. This relationship was used in
calculating the length of the pipe by using fn=(nv)/(2L). n for the
slower speed trial is calculated to be 3, so that for the faster speed trial should
be 4. The length was calculated to be 0.837m and 0.850m respectively for the
slow and fast speed. The percentage errors for these two trials were
acceptable. Sources of error could be the stretching pipe. Both of the
experimental lengths had larger results than the actual length. This could be
caused by the pipe stretched during spinning.
No comments:
Post a Comment